Letting Go:

Sometimes you want something so badly that you keep fighting for it long after the battle is lost. I’ve been pursuing a particular few relationships for some time now, and frankly, I’ve got to be honest with myself and acknowledge that I’ve overspent on them, and still have nothing to show for it. I’m burnt out on them; I’m tired of trying when they haven’t.

I feel like I’ve been going through a lot of attitude changes lately about educating people. I’ve become jaded. How many cis people do you know of that spend every day self-educating about trans related science, medical studies, theories, answering questions, engaging with people, and generally just being completely immersed in trans stuff 24 hours a day, 7 days a week? Honestly, not even all trans people bother.

But yet, somehow, cis people feel like they are equipped to not just tell me I’m wrong, but to actually completely dismiss me without even making an argument! Are you really so sure of your viewpoint you developed through your occasional reading something interesting on the internet, or watching Oprah, or Dr. Phil? Do you honestly think you have a fucking clue?

Look, when I tell you your viewpoint is flawed, I’m not just going to tell you I disagree and say what I believe. I’m going to give you science. You do believe in science, don’t you? You do realize you can believe in God and science at the same time, right? I’m not just making this shit up; I’ll cite you studies and sources if you are patient, if you really need to prove to yourself that I’m not spouting off things that I only wish were true. No, you can’t just say you don’t believe all that. What the actual fuck? SCIENCE. It’s not a belief. It’s just how shit works. You can’t just not believe in GRAVITY. For fucks sake. If somebody proves something about trans people, it just is what it fucking is. It’s not an opinion to disagree with. It’s not a viewpoint. It’s FACT. BECAUSE IT WAS PROVEN. Shit. Do I really have to explain this? YES, THERE REALLY IS REAL SCIENCE ABOUT THIS SHIT. FUCK. DO YOU THINK WE ARE ALL JUST MAKING THIS SHIT UP? EVEN THE PEOPLE THAT AREN’T TRANS? THE THOUSANDS OF MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OUT THERE THAT TREAT TRANS PEOPLE, ALL OF THEM ARE FULL OF SHIT? GET THE FUCK OVER YOURSELF.

Oh, and I’m sorry that you are in so much pain watching me go through this. That’s got to be just about as hard as actually going through it yourself. I’m sure the emotional stress you would have to put yourself through for just one night of your life is too great for me to ask of you, considering it’s only going to influence how you treat me for the rest of our lives. I’m not really worth it, I understand.

Tolerance isn’t support. Tolerance is a step better than FUCK YOU. Acceptance isn’t support. Acceptance is a step better than I GUESS I DON’T HAVE A CHOICE. I want your approval. Yeah, I’m a grown ass adult, and I don’t need anyone’s approval to live my life. Absolutely true. I’m going to do my deal regardless of where you stand. BUT YOU CANNOT BE SUPPORTIVE IF YOU DO NOT GIVE YOUR APPROVAL. Approval is an agreement that my solution to my problem was appropriate.

Having some of the most important people in my life stubbornly refuse to even attempt to learn about my life to even have the potential to give approval is beyond hurtful.

And to the people whose concerns lie with what the Bible says about homosexuality, we are talking about a book that was written THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO. To say that our understanding of the science behind sex and gender has grown would be an absurd understatement. Anyone with even a foot in the door in sexual development education knows that SHIT ISN’T AS SIMPLE AS A DICHOTOMY. FUCK. If you want to talk to me about intersex conditions and scientifically supported trans stuff and how they relate to homosexuality and the Bible, I’m interested as shit on the topic, but unless you have some really clear answers on that (trust me, you don’t), you can shove your irrelevant literal interpretation of questionably translated outdated assumptions up your arse.

And what the fuck is up with the backwards assed logic of trying to explain to me how trans stuff can’t be real because of “what the Bible says about homosexuality” instead of looking at the science and then questioning the THOUSANDS OF YEARS OLD TEXT as to why it is saying something isn’t okay that obviously isn’t as cut and dry as they seem to think it was?

I’m sick of fighting with shitty fucking people. You can’t be bothered to educate your own ignorant asses, but you want to tell me how shit works?

I’m not even going to bother with you anymore if you can’t be bothered with yourself. Nope, I’m just going to make fun of you. It will accomplish about as much, and it’s way more gratifying to me.

So with that, I’m giving up on some people.

To my extended family:

I’m clearly not going to be a part of my extended family now or at any point in the future, and I’m done fighting for it. To the aunts, you never argued in good faith; you never tried.

To my older brother:

Dude, my heart always will have a place for you if you ever come knocking, but I can’t spend one more tear on you until you pursue ME for a change. You gave up on me without even a fight, and that hurts more than anyone else in the world could have hurt me with their deepest stab or their hardest punch. I forgive you.

To my mom:

You haven’t even tried. 

To Grace Church:

You unanimously rejected me without even a discussion. Every individual’s identical reaction to me added up to a total and complete silent shut-out that persists to this day. Do you even realize what you did?

The Gatekeeping Fallacy

The process of transition isn’t the same for all trans people, but there is a common pool of potential medical procedures and treatments that can be selected from, as desired. Some of these treatments and procedures can be undertaken freely (free as in freedom, not as in free beer); others require approval from a qualified professional. For the restricted treatments and procedures, you generally must acquire one or more letters of recommendation from licensed therapist(s) with appropriate credentials.

The WPATH Standards of Care (SOC) is a document that outlines the recommended path for all people who wish to transition. The target audience consists of therapists who work with trans people and medical professionals who administer treatment or procedures to trans people. While there is no legal requirement for professionals in the United States to conform to this document, the vast majority of medical professionals in the United States do in fact follow it. Other countries vary with their level of conformance, but the SOC is generally accepted worldwide as “the” standard of care for trans people.

In its most recent revision (7th at the time of this writing), the SOC is written as a suggested path, not an absolute. There are areas where more or less flexibility is afforded depending on certain conditions.

From the perspective of a person who is attempting to transition, the SOC represents a series of hoops we must jump through to get access to the basic healthcare that we need to function normally. The therapists who we must acquire these letters of recommendation from are usually referred to as “gatekeepers”, because they carefully guard the “gate” of transition from those who might attempt to transition erroneously they don’t like.

The system is designed such that a trans person is in therapy the entire time they are in transition, from the moment they begin considering it until after all desired restricted procedures and treatments have been acquired. There is typically a time requirement attached to the restrictions to ensure that the person who is transitioning has had ample time to consider their desires, and for the therapist to have ample time to consider their gatekeeping role.

This system has a very serious flaw though, which is that the gatekeepers are human. Gatekeepers have their own preconceptions that affect their choices about whether to grant access to restricted procedures and treatments to an individual.

There are many different types of people who wish to transition, and the SOC does not attempt to discriminate. If you have a persistent and well documented gender dysphoria, and you have met all the requirements, you are entitled access to the treatments and procedures that you desire, according to the SOC. Thus, the fact that gatekeepers are imposing their own preconceptions is contrary to how things are intended to operate.

Many gatekeepers have a misconception based around an erroneous idea of the True Transsexual. They believe that every trans woman should be feminine, hates her penis, wants a vagina, is attracted to men, wears makeup, wants to take female hormones, wants boobs, and wears skirts and makeup. If you fail to largely conform to this ideal, you may be denied treatment indefinitely.

The problem with this thinking is that not even all cis women are like that. A cis woman is a woman whose assigned sex at birth matches their gender. Cis women come in all shapes and sizes, all personalities and presentations, and all sexual orientations. Thus, the idea that all transsexual women should conform only to the most extreme possible end of the spectrum just to gain access to transition is absurd. It also completely dismisses anyone that does not identify within the binary gender system. Let me state again that the SOC does not discriminate in this manner.

But yet, this scenario that I’ve described is hardly an edge case. Rather, I’d say it is the most common scenario, in my experience. Out of the vast number of trans people I know, a great many of them have experienced some form of excessive gatekeeping that I’ve described at one point or another. A staggering amount of them are completely unable to receive any medical care for their transition due to this issue. And what it ultimately boils down to for most of them is that they were honest about who they are and the way that their gender dysphoria manifests itself, and it did not conform to the pervasive erroneous requirements that the gatekeepers are placing on them.

Because of how pervasive this abuse of power is, you can never really know or even guess that the therapist or medical professional you are working with is of an appropriate mindset without potentially compromising your transition. The only way to really be sure that you are going to get the medical care that you need, as a person who is attempting to transition, is to present to the gatekeeper what you believe they are looking for. You play the part; you act for them. Sometimes you’d best even lie.

Going through transition is a very mentally and emotionally taxing process. Talking through the experience on a regular basis with somebody that is giving you their full attention is important. This is what therapists are primarily there to do. Unfortunately, my therapeutic needs are completely at odds with the gatekeeping role.

I just had the one year anniversary of my Real Life Experience, as required by the SOC for vaginoplasty. The requirements for this are fairly strict, so although I began what I would call “full time” a year and a half ago, they do not consider me to have been fill time until a few months later when my legal name change was ordered by a judge. My therapist is currently in the process of writing me a letter of recommendation for genital surgery. I have lied to him the entire time I’ve known him. I have not been able to talk to him about the very real concerns I struggled with for a long while as to whether I even wanted to have genital surgery.

What I am trying to illustrate to you is that the gatekeeper inherently and immutably prevents the very thing from happening that they are designed to do. The person that is in the role to grant or deny access to something cannot ever also be the person to assist you in deciding whether that something is right for you or not.

But wait, if the gatekeeper can’t help me, who can? Well, another therapist who has nothing to do with my transition gatekeeping could. But then I’m paying two therapists for the same job, and I’m still lying to one of them.

Gatekeeping exists for two reasons: to protect people from themselves and to protect medical professionals from us.

The entire idea of trying to protect people from themselves is horribly flawed, and it will never really work. Anyone that is determined to transition can get through this process, even as broken and frustrating as it is, simply by lying a lot and playing the part.

Medical professionals take a risk when they perform procedures or treatments on an individual. The risk is that the individual will regret the procedure and blame the medical professional for allowing it. Medical professionals are attempting to shield themselves from litigation by conforming to the SOC. The fact that anyone can lie and play the part to get through the gatekeeping applies to this also, but there is another problem with this argument. There are other procedures such as facial feminization surgery that do not have any requirements whatsoever. Some restricted procedures are very easy to acquire without even disclosing that you are trans, such as breast augmentation provided you look convincingly female. These procedures that are very readily available place the medical professional at risk for litigation just as much as the heavily guarded procedures. Thus, this argument for the existence of gatekeeping is flawed.

The only person that really knows what a trans person’s needs are is the individual trans person. All trans medical care should operate under informed consent. They inform you of the risks, and you consent to it. Therapists should stick to what they are designed to do: listen to you, talk to you, offer advice, and give you a shoulder to cry on.

Gatekeeping isn’t ever going to work properly. It isn’t ever going to actually prevent what it is designed to prevent, yet it manages to prevent people who need medical care from acquiring it.

Re: Re: Re: upcoming family reunion, restrooms:

Aunt [name], Aunt [name], and Aunt [name],

I don’t care about the dormitory for the sake of the dormitory. I care about being treated the same as any other woman that comes to the reunion. Access to the dormitory is unquestioningly given to all of the other women that come to this reunion. You don’t ask about their genitals. You don’t check every new woman that comes around. You actually don’t even know for sure that one of the wives of the men there aren’t trans too. You could already have trans people in your midst and not even know it. In fact, it is impossible for you to prove there aren’t other trans women in the family. Every year, there are visitors from outside the family. One of them could be trans. If I was a visitor and not part of the family, I wouldn’t have told you, and you wouldn’t have known.

> Acceptance doesn’t come that way. Demanding it, requiring it, will not bring it to you.

That’s hardly true. Look at the LGBT civil rights movements. Look specifically at the transgender movement today. We aren’t gaining any ground by asking nicely. Yes, I’m demanding acceptance. And yes, I am getting it, slowly but surely. I may not be able to reach you or the family right now. But it is a matter of time, either from older generations dying off and making way for younger and more accepting generations, or by the younger generations realizing that they don’t agree with the discrimination of their elders.

People aren’t born with this kind of prejudice. It is taught; it is passed down from generation to generation. In my experience, the younger people are, the more unquestioningly accepting they are.

> Acceptance involves two people, one who gives it and one who receives it, a two way street.   

You don’t need to have a black person in your life to be racist against blacks. You don’t need a trans person in your life to be discriminatory towards trans people.

You don’t need me or any other trans person in your life to be accepting to trans people.

Don’t sit here and blame the minority for the majority’s ignorance and discrimination. It isn’t my responsibility to educate you. It isn’t my responsibility to put myself out there on your terms so that you can “get used to” me. Your choice to discriminate has nothing at all to do with me.

> because we were brought up to agree to disagree

Agreeing to disagree could look like you permitting me access to the places that I have a right to be in. You could just as easily tell me that you strongly disagree with me being in those spaces, but allow it anyway, because you are agreeing to disagree. The reality is, you aren’t agreeing to disagree. You are taking a side on this, and you are not backing down. Don’t act like I’m the only one standing my ground here.

Rights aren’t given, they are immutable. I have a right to access women’s spaces regardless of whether you permit it or not. You are not dictating my rights, you are violating them. What I don’t have a right to is attending the reunion. That is a privilege. Thus you are leveraging your power over a privilege to get me to relinquish my rights.

> Letting go is being gracious.   We women are fairly good at this.  We learn to go with the flow and accommodate our husbands quite often.

You are speaking to a staunch feminist and a lesbian woman. That doesn’t sound like you being gracious to me. It sounds like the life you have chosen because you prefer it. That’s fine, I’m not knocking it. But don’t act like what you are doing is a moral higher ground.

> Being right is often a lonely place to be. 

So is being discriminated against. But I’d rather be lonely than willingly submit myself to discrimination.

> Because of the lack of privacy in the dorm areas, your physic could become a topic.

It’s not like I’d walk around naked in there. What are you so worried about?

> These parents have a responsibility to their children and they are the ones who need to determine when it is appropriate to explain/teach their children lessons of sexual topics.

I’m going to be outside where they can see me anyway. What difference does it make whether that is in the dorms or not?

> If you come to the reunion with a ‘right fighting attitude’

I’m talking about this with you because you are in a position of power to discriminate. I have no intentions of talking about this stuff with everyone else. I’m not going there to pick a fight with everyone. There are only a few people with the ability to choose whether to enforce this discrimination or not, and those few are the only ones I’m interested in talking about this with.

> Kelsie, if you cannot deal with the situation as described, we ask that you not attend the reunion.

That’s a very real possibility to me.

As the years go on, I’m not going to become more willing to allow myself to be discriminated against. Next year, if I attempt to come to the reunion again, I will make the same demands; that I not be discriminated against. And if you don’t choose to stop discriminating, you will still be discriminating next year. And the next year. And the next year. When does the discrimination stop? When can I see my family without being discriminated against?

You aren’t asking me not to attend this reunion. You are asking me to agree to discrimination. I believe that you actually do want me to attend.

It’s not going to happen on these terms. Not now, not ever.

This is comparable to the history of racism against black people in the United States. We all know there was a time not that long ago that black people were required to use different bathrooms and sit in the back of the bus. You really are doing the same thing to me right now. Sure, the black people had another bathroom they could use. I’m sure they shouldn’t have minded; the bathroom was just as convenient. Right? Right? No. Not right. It’s a load of crap that we abolished many years ago. Stop repeating history.

Kelsie

Re: Re: upcoming family reunion, restrooms:

Kelsie,

We want you to know that no matter what choices you have made you are part of the [last name] family.  We would not be having this dialog if that were not so.  We care about you the same way we do any other family member no matter what the issue.  We want to make this a wonderful [last name] reunion for all the [last name] family.  We are sure that you concur and want the same. 

I (Aunt [name]) am well aware from your emails to me and our conversation on the phone, that acceptance is paramount for you.  And you seem to equate that acceptance with access to the dormitory.  Acceptance doesn’t come that way.   Demanding it, requiring it, will not bring it to you.  Acceptance involves two people, one who gives it and one who receives it, a two way street.   These two people need to have the same attributes in order for ‘acceptance’ to happen.  Some of there attributes are love, compassion, empathy, sympathy, hospitality, kindness, forgiveness, loyalty, honesty, and others. 

Individuals in the [last name] family exhibit varying degrees of these and that may limit acceptance of you by that individual person.  Some may give you total acceptance, others none.  It hasn’t anything to do with the dormitory.  But that being said, unless you are exhibiting some of these traits in your interaction with these family members, there will be no acceptance.   If you come to the reunion with a ‘right fighting attitude’ (a Dr. Phil expression that means you would rather fight with a person and possibly ruin the relationship than to just let it go), we can almost guarantee that the weekend will not be a pleasant one for you or others.  The reason the [last name] family is still enjoying the reunions after all these years is because we were brought up to agree to disagree.  That entails moving on to happier subjects and issues.  The [last name] family also brings to the reunion fundamental Christian beliefs and to ignore the fact that they are going to play a huge role in your ‘acceptance’ is like putting on blinders.

Letting go is being gracious.   We women are fairly good at this.  We learn to go with the flow and accommodate our husbands quite often.  Being right is often a lonely place to be.  So we are asking you to be gracious and come to terms with the accommodations that we discussed.  They are as follows;

  • Housing in the motel unit.  A toilet closet is located in or next to each room.  FYI  It is very rare for motel dwellers to use any facilities other than the ones provided there.  They have found them quite convenient.
  • Use of showers on either end of the motel unit.  They are used on an occupied/non-occupied basis.
  • Use of bathroom and shower stalls in restrooms next to creek.
  • No access to either side of the dormitory.  This area offers very little privacy and young children/people use the facility. 

We would like to revisit the dormitory use since this seems to be a sticking point for you.  This is where the acceptance accompanied with some of the traits listed above, needs to come from you to other family members.  These parents have a responsibility to their children and they are the ones who need to determine when it is appropriate to explain/teach their children lessons of sexual topics.  Because of the lack of privacy in the dorm areas, your physic could become a topic.  We simply do not want that to happen. It is not what our reunion is about.  You have other areas to use so be gracious and cut us some slack. 

Kelsie, if you cannot deal with the situation as described, we ask that you not attend the reunion.  We do not want to add to your pain nor do we want to have a situation that would cause strife for either you or other family members.  Otherwise, we expect that you will bring your maturity accompanied with compassion and be a gracious young lady that you are who has no agenda other than enjoying the company of herextended family.

Love from your great aunts,

Aunt [name], Aunt [name], and Aunt [name]

Re: upcoming family reunion, restrooms:

Hey Aunt [name],

I’ve been pondering your proposed condition since we last spoke, and I wanted to share my thoughts with you on it.

As I’m sure you noticed, I am quite upset with your request that I avoid gendered spaces while attending this year’s family reunion. I was unable to fully articulate my feelings on this during our last conversation.

You made a statement to the effect that too many people would probably take issue with my presence in gendered spaces, and thus should be avoided. You stated that we could take another look at this next year.

This places the burden of achieving acceptance on my shoulders instead of the family. It makes it acceptable for them to not accept me, and even to not tolerate me. People will fall under one of three categories: those who are accepting, those who are intolerant, and those who are only tolerant. The category of concern to you is the category that will be intolerant, because they are the ones who will vocalize their concerns.

The ones who are tolerant (but not accepting) are already not a concern for you. They are also the ones with a chance of a change of heart from this year to the next.

In all likelihood, somebody that is vocally intolerant of me this year will not accept me next year either. In effect, you are delaying the problem by a year, but failing to actually resolve it.

Furthermore, on what criteria will people accept me? On what criteria will you accept me? You already expressed your doubts as to my ability to appear completely female. Based on past experience and your own attitude, I find it reasonable to conclude and assume that your perceptions of me and the family’s perceptions of me will largely come down to my ability to appear completely female and to conform to the usage of feminine mannerisms and actions.

That entire premise is fundamentally flawed. I am extraordinarily fortunate in that my body only required facial modifications in order to appear quite feminine. But what if that were not the case? What if I had football player shoulders? What if I were much less financially fortunate? I wouldn’t have been able to afford the extremely costly procedures that made me appear this way.

In my day to day life, nobody knows that I wasn’t born as I appear unless I tell them. You can be skeptical all you want to be, but my lived experience is that I am now being treated as though people can no longer tell my history on sight. In the past, it was blatantly clear when people could tell. But my identity, my inherent and immutable femaleness is no more valid than somebody that is completely unable to appear as convincingly female.

I also take issue with the constant genital-based judgment. Our society is inexplicably obsessed with genitalia, against all logic and reason. When you asked me about the current condition of my genitals on the phone, I was and am extremely offended that you would ask. What business are my private parts to anyone other than me? What gives you a right to inquire about them? They are called private parts for a reason. You would never dream of asking most people about their genitals, so why is it any different with me? Yet, almost all people seem to think it is a completely okay question to ask the moment they find out somebody is trans.

This discrepancy in how trans people are treated is based in the belief that genitals fundamentally define a person’s gender and sex. But this entire line of thinking is terribly flawed, if you take a few moments to consider it.

If you are educated on the topic of intersex conditions, then you already know that doctors very frequently coercively “normalize” infants’ genitalia, both without the consent of the parents, and without enough baseline knowledge about the specific infant to know for sure that the direction they decided to normalize was actually the most appropriate. These children grow up and all too often find that their birth sex assignment and genitalia are obviously dissonant with their gender.

One particular story I’d like to highlight is the trans woman who was recently denied a sex marker change on her drivers’ license, because she hadn’t had genital surgery. She proceeded to walk outside the DMV and removed her shirt and bra, exposing her fully developed breasts. It wasn’t even 5 minutes before she was arrested for public indecency. She was not released upon presenting her drivers’ license to the arresting officer. Very clearly, she was socially female; she was expected to live under female norms. The reality is, her genitals are completely irrelevant to this situation. It would be most appropriate for her to legally be female.

Another argument to make is that there are circumstances that can physically damage one’s genitalia. There was a USMC marine who was recently shot in his genitals. They were completely destroyed; unrecoverable. The surgeon removed what was left of his genitals and created a urinary tract from a skin graft that terminated on his groin. The area is flat otherwise, and if he were to wear tight clothing, it would resemble a vagina. He wears a prosthetic penis to assist with him peeing while standing up, as well as to give the illusion that he has normal genitalia still. During sex, he uses a strap-on device, same as a lesbian couple might. He might not have a penis, but I dare you to declare that he is anything other than a man.

When I told you that I have genitals that are neither normal for a male nor normal for a female, you expressed that you do see me as a third gender. If you say that about me, you are implicitly saying the same about the marine.

When you asked me about my genitals, you forced me into answering. I could not refuse to answer when asked, because you would have taken that as an admission that I have not had genital surgery, which is how you filter everything I’ve said about my identity.

I could have just lied about my genitals. Are you going to check what’s in my pants next time you see me? What about all the other women? Do you plan to check their genitals too?

Not all trans people can afford surgery. To say that only those that can afford a particular procedure have valid identities is classism. To reduce all trans people’s identities to their genitals is objectifying.

I am legally female. The state department agrees, New York State agrees, North Carolina agrees, and my birth state Texas agrees. I have a court order that is valid in any competent American court that agrees. I have a drivers’ license and a passport to prove this.

If anyone has a problem with this, I have legal documentation they can review if they are curious. Nobody has any legal premise to argue that I’m unwelcome in a woman-only space.

It isn’t up to other people whether I’m welcome in the gendered space that matches my identity. Why are you giving them the power to decide this?

Why is it more important to you that everyone else is comfortable than it is that I’m comfortable? None of them have to show up to a large gathering as a different gender than they did last time just to continue to be a part of their family. All they have to do is not be judgmental. It is already, right off the bat, far easier for them to cope with this entire situation. But for me, this is absolutely going to be a stressful experience. Everything about my identity and personhood, including my most private areas are going to be constantly questioned and discussed with every new interaction. Why are you not making it a priority to make sure that I’m comfortable?

What is to be scared of with me anyway? Are you or others worried that I’m some hideous man monster wearing girls’ clothes as a way of preying on women? As absurd as I think that is, it’s even more absurd because this is my own family. Is there really a legitimate concern that I might aim to prey sexually on my own cousins by the most ridiculous method possible? I do not believe that anyone who gives this a fair and rational thought could conclude that this is a legitimate concern.

Maybe the concern is that I’m a sexual deviant, and people don’t want their children exposed to such evil things? I seriously doubt that anyone is going to manage to completely shield their children from any and all interactions with me for the entire weekend. The camp isn’t that big, and I’m not exactly planning on hiding in dark places during the daytime. What difference does it make if they encounter me in gendered spaces? If that is really the concern, you should be making the argument that I’m completely unwelcome at the reunion at all.

As a leader in this family, isn’t it your place to be just as intolerant towards intolerance about these issues as you suspect some people will be intolerant towards me?

You cannot expect all minorities to fully represent themselves. The majority generally does not understand minority issues as well as the minorities that are affected, but they so vastly outnumber the minorities that the minorities practically have no voice at all. You, as a leader, have a voice. Please use it.

Love,
Kelsie

Privilege & Marginalization

Over the last couple of days, I’ve experienced a very major internal rewiring. As I write this right now, I’m nearly in tears over realizing how blind I’ve been to my own participation in a problem that comes right around and negatively impacts me every day that I live. My hope is that you will read this and something in it will grab hold of your heart as well, like it did mine when I encountered it.

This all started for me with the word “tranny”. The word “tranny” is a porn word. It has no basis in reality. I know some trans people who attempt to reclaim the word and self-identify as trannies, and throw the word around. But what those trans people are is not generally different from the wide variety of trans people out there that despise the word for all the connotations it is inherently bundled with.

Honestly, ask yourself, what mental image do you get when you hear the word? I’ll bet you are picturing a [possibly naked] person that appears about halfway between male and female. They have a feminine appearance, but something about their face screams “man”. They have a penis and boobs. If you hear them speak, their voice is definitely uncomfortably deep. They may have some facial hair shadow showing. They are overly emotional and hyper feminine. They are probably wearing high heels. The word tranny does not invoke a sense of person. It serves only to objectify, fetishize, dehumanize, and hypersexualize the trans experience.

Trans people are far from alone though. Every minority group in existence has their own list of words like “tranny” that equally misrepresent and dehumanize the group they refer to.

Outside of the minorities that “own” the words, there are a lot of people trying to “reclaim” these words. Picture somebody saying this:

“He nigger rigged the bumper back onto the car.”
“Dude, stop being such a retard.”
“That’s so gay.”

Slurs such as these are so common that they are often – perhaps even usually — completely overlooked. And I’m barely scraping the surface on the vast selection of slurs available.

We’ve all heard remarks about why it is okay to use these words:

“You need to stop being so sensitive.”
“It’s just a joke.”
“I’m not really talking about that, it’s just a word.”
“I can say whatever I want.”

What the unoppressed fail to recognize is exactly how oppressed the targeted minorities actually are. It is all too easy to mentally minimize the impact of our words when we don’t experience the other side.

I spent 25 years of my life living as a guy. I wasn’t really a guy internally, but it took me exactly 25 years to figure out why I felt broken and what I needed to do to fix it. During these years, I just barely scraped the surface of understanding the position in society that I held without question. I have been a feminist since long before I realized I am female, but the level of naivety that I unknowingly embraced alongside my fellow men has now proven to be nothing short of astounding. I didn’t realize my loss of privilege until I finished transitioning. All of a sudden, when I’m talking, people blatantly disregard what I’m saying without thought, I’m interrupted more, men assume incompetence, everywhere I go in public every moment of the day I am on persistent alert on a level I never had to approach when living as a man, I’m frequently treated as fundamentally inferior to men, and I’m spoken to as though my primary purpose of existence is to please and serve men.

I had absolutely zero clues as to how serious this was before transitioning; not even the faintest idea. When men crack the ol’ sammich joke or tell me to get back where I belong [in the kitchen], I can relate back to when I was still thinking I was a man. I made those same remarks. I did it all in good fun. I told women to stop being so sensitive. As a former straight white [thought I was] cisgender [lived as] male, I utilized innumerable derogatory slurs in my daily speech and I always used these same excuses.

At some point, I started asking myself how far a reform on how I speak could or should realistically be taken. I think it is pretty easy to let go of saying “nigger”. Most people already don’t say it. I sure as shit don’t say it except as an example of what I don’t say. It’s probably the most obvious derogatory slur that’s just not acceptable to say in really any social circle unless you yourself are part of the affected minority.

But what about words that are less obvious?

Let’s talk about “derp”. People generally use it to express stupidity. An example usage for the word could be, “Ohhhh, I didn’t realize that was you! Derp derp derp.” You probably don’t realize this, but “derp” is actually a word that originated from a film in a context that was absolutely mocking a mentally disabled person. Out of all the minority groups out there, the mentally disabled are probably the least capable of defending themselves. That’s my theory for why few people make a big deal about slurs against them. But I don’t believe this means that the slurs are less hurtful to them.

I see really two ways to go from here. I could let go of my hatred of the word “tranny”, as it is the slur most used against me. I could embrace the sammich jokes and just stop being so sensitive. Or, I could stop using slurs against all minorities and realize that I have no ability to comprehend the damage that my words cause to a group of people that I’m not a part of. Anything else would be hypocrisy.

These slurs do nothing but perpetuate misconception and hurt. I think it’s time we checked our privilege and stop joking around about things that aren’t funny.

Doubt and Regret

I’ve never been the type of person to put off decisions. When presented with a choice, no matter how difficult, I systematically narrow the options down to the best possible outcomes, and then if there is no remaining reason to pick one over the other(s), I pick a direction and run with it. Through much life experience of doing this, I’ve developed a good sense of danger, because I’ve ended up with both good results and bad results.

When going through a journey as large as transitioning, there is always the looming worry that transitioning is a mistake for me. Before you jump to the conclusion that this looming worry is an indication in and of itself that transition is a mistake for me, you should also be aware that I had this same looming worry about not transitioning being a mistake when I was at the point in my life that I was trying to make the decision of whether to transition or not.

Whether I had decided to transition or not, I was making an irreversible choice. The male body goes through multiple stages of masculinization, and in the late 20s, the body goes through another irreversible phase. At the beginning of my transition, I could feel the onset of these changes, and even in this year that is so full of feminizing changes, I could tell that I was fighting a war in my body to halt what the testosterone was working so hard to accomplish. This situation created a very real urgency about stepping forward in one direction or the other, committing to a lifetime of the fruit of my decision.

Faced with this choice of whether to transition or not, I carefully considered every outcome I could think of. I asked myself many questions. I spent many days and nights pondering every side of this that I could think of. If I didn’t transition, did I have any reason to think that my gender dysphoria would change in a powerful way that it hadn’t in nearly 26 years of struggling with it? Could I live with this for the rest of my life without it changing? If I did transition and regretted it, would I be able to live with myself? What if it actually solved the problem that it was the supposed solution for? Would I really be happier with the gender dysphoria problem solved even in the face of so many new problems that would be created? What do other people who have been through this have to say? What do other people who know me have to say? The list goes on, but I’m sure you get the idea.

Unfortunately, there is just no way to know the answer to all these questions without living through it. I would have to choose to move forward in one direction or the other. I decided to start transitioning, but I started with reversible changes and avoided permanent changes at all costs. I knew I was moving quickly, so I wanted to give myself as much time as possible to really feel what I was doing and to give myself ample opportunity to experience doubt and regret. One step at a time, I would select a change that would expose me to what I was doing without forcing me to make the permanent commitment.

There was a notable exception: facial hair. My hair is quite dark, and as such, even cleanly shaven, it has always been a major challenge to achieve a feminine appearance. Early on in transition, I discovered that it takes upwards to 2 years to fully remove facial hair permanently. I made the decision that even if I reverted my transition, I would be able to be happy without the ability to grow facial hair. I started permanent hair removal just weeks into my transition.

One step at a time, I made a change, and then stopped and asked myself, “How do you feel right now? Are you happy with the change you made? Do you feel regret? Do you feel apprehensive about the very next step in front of you?” I never committed to the whole process at once. I never once said, “I’m going to transition from male to female.” I had only decided that I liked what I had done and was going to take another step in that direction.

Over time, and not even very much time, I had changed quite a lot. Right from the start, I picked my new first name, Kelsie. Just two weeks in, I never presented as male again except when I had to grow facial hair for electrolysis. I built up a new wardrobe, learned how to do makeup, and began growing my hair out.

After about 2 months, I told my family what I was doing. Their responses were quite varied, but for the most part, everyone was very surprised and/or upset. I did not get the recognition, support, and approval that I had sought. They were so upset about it that they couldn’t even manage to really talk to me about it and express even the legitimate concerns they probably had. It took many months to even get to the point where we could talk about it. I couldn’t wait for them to come around, and frankly, I think them seeing me living as a woman was the catalyst that finally helped them accept it. If I had waited around for them to catch up to where I was before I continued my transition, I’m not sure it ever would have happened.

After about 3 months, I was running out of non-permanent changes that I could make. I was quite satisfied with myself. I was happy with every change that I had made. I was even happier with how my inner Kelsie had been released by these changes. At this point, there was simply no way I could justify not going further. So far, everything that transition had promised me had come true, and I was the happiest I had ever been in my life. My therapist was very much in agreement; she could see how much transitioning had done for me. I felt very alive for the first time, and it was shining powerfully.

I started taking hormones around that time. I knew hormones would take a while before any physical changes occurred, and I wanted to get an idea of whether I could handle the emotional and mental changes that hormone replacement therapy would cause.

Two months later, I changed my legal name to Kelsie my middle name to Nicole. Three months after my name was changed, I had a major facial surgery that changed two features of my face that absolutely inhibited my ability to appear feminine: my enormous brow ridge and my nose.

Three months after the operation, November 2011, I have been “full time” for most of the year, and was living with zero regrets about the steps I had taken. Hormone replacement therapy had proven to me that I absolutely wanted to always be on female hormones for the rest of my life. I did not have any physical changes from hormone replacement therapy yet, so I decided that it was time to do what I had to do to make that process really start. Because of my particular situation that I’m not going to get into detail on right now, I had already decided that an orchiectomy was the only good way to make this happen. Late November, I had this done.

As I recently revealed in a prior blog post, I now consider my transition complete. So let’s talk about how I feel now. Many of the inhibitions I feel are related to my beliefs about God, so I wrote a lot about it. I know that many of my readers don’t believe what I believe, but I hope you can at least understand the impact this had on me, knowing what I believe.

I realize that a lot of the good feelings I felt during transition was novelty. The novelty of transition has worn off. I’m happy with what I have done, but I would say that it is more like being brought out of the negative than moving into the positive. I feel like I’m functioning properly now, where before I was malfunctioning.

If I examine myself internally and reflect on my own desires, I’m very happy with what I’ve done. But a part of me feels the need to reconcile this with others. I grew up heavily participating in a non-denominational born-again Christian church. I lost every single friendship I had from there as a result of my transition. There are a few people who are still Facebook friends with me, but are entirely non-communicative, and the ones that I’ve reached out to consistently cannot manage to even talk to me. I still love God with all my heart, mind, soul, and strength. It is painful that I am rejected, and treated with contempt because they expect that I “knew better” than to do this.

An always-looming question is whether God accepts me as his daughter or if he still sees me as his son, an idea which I loathe. I am quite fearful that one day I’m going to feel spiritually compelled to de-transition on the basis that one cannot change what they are, and that God did not actually make me female, despite how I feel internally. This would be angering since I so heavily pursued his input before this was a permanent thing. This would be angering since the very people that I needed so badly to help me make the right choice based on our shared beliefs rejected me, so I had to make the decision alone. If there is one thing that I’ve learned over years of pursuing God, it is that two or more people are better than one when listening to God, because it helps sift out our own biases, filters, and selfish desires.

I recently went to this same church to see if I could get an input on how God sees me right now, without revealing to the people who I was. I found a man that has prophesied over me multiple times in the past, and I decided to ask him if he could just listen for a minute and ask God if he had anything at all to say. In my belief system, prophesy is something anyone can do; it is a fancy word for “listening to God and saying exactly what you hear or see in your mind to the person that you are prophesying over”. It is up to the receiving party to interpret what it means to them, usually, in my experience. The idea was that this man wouldn’t know who I was, and that if he referred to me as “daughter”, then I could have the peace of knowing that I was recognized as female by God. In hindsight, that would be a pretty poor foundation to base anything on because humankind doesn’t hear God perfectly, and it is quite possible that even if God said “son”, they might hear “daughter” because the person they are looking at is female. Prophesy isn’t a perfect and exact thing in my experience, and you have to weigh it every time and decide if you really feel that it is from God. My tendency is to shelf anything that is not crystal clear and obviously from God. The man recognized me immediately when I presented him with my request; my cover was blown. He did listen for me anyway though, and said, “God says, ‘I love you, my son.’”. I was immediately distraught, probably visibly so. He could probably see my face change, and immediately began defending what he had said with things like, “The last time anyone here saw you, you were male, and now you return and you are female. You can’t expect people to just accept that immediately. By doing this, you are basically saying that God made a mistake.” I immediately regained my composure when he said these things because I realized that he himself was so extremely biased that he could not be trusted to have really heard God clearly. Honestly, I should have walked away as soon as he realized who I was, because I expected that sort of response from anyone that knew who I was. Also, there is the fact that “I love you, my <son/daughter>” is a pretty damned generic thing. You could say that to any person on the planet. There is no check and balance in the message that resonates as confirmation that it really was God talking to me. So I shelved that experience, and I regret pursuing an answer in that manner.

I had a dream the other night where I was pregnant. In the dream, this was making me quite happy, and it was just a complete joy of a dream. When I awoke, I somehow retained the understanding of this desire. For the first time in my entire life, I suddenly know what it feels like to want to be a mother, to carry my child, to birth offspring, to raise them. This is totally out of nowhere. I have never experienced anything even remotely like this before, and I have zero understanding why this just happened now or why a dream is what brought it about. I’m not sitting here “wishing I was pregnant”, but I understand the desire now, and I simply cannot rule out the possibility that this might grow into something serious. I cannot bear children (yet? Medical science has some exciting possibilities in this area…). But that doesn’t mean I cannot or should not experience a normal and healthy desire (this is not to say that a lack of desire for offspring is abnormal or unhealthy).

At the end of the day, I do not believe I’m actually going to get any sort of a clear answer from God. I do not believe that people are going to prove to be a particularly useful input as to whether this is really right for me. I am really fucking happy with myself. I love myself now. I feel great. I do not want to revert this. I don’t want to go back, ever. I regret nothing, and the only thing that would ever make me regret it is if I decided that it was a mistake. I believe that God is the only person that has the influence to cause me to decide that this was a mistake, and I’m quite skeptical that will ever happen. I believe that more time in the place that I’ve travelled to will set things more firmly in my heart and mind that I’ve made the right choice.

I regret nothing. My doubts have no foundation. I am happy.